© OJG 3rd and sonofgodwordsoul.com, 2013 Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material, digital images and/or photos without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to OJG 3rd sonofgodwordsoul.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Is There a Divine Pattern?

What is the shape of our universe? Why do many celestial bodies in space seem to favor spherical geometry? In order to make this determination, one would need to find the pattern of all the celestial bodies moving through space. A LOCI PATTERN should emerge where each solar system curves by virtue of its orbit around another. Are there different time zones in the universe? If there are different time zones in our universe, can those time zones affect our measurement of time? According to the Bible in 2nd Corinthians chapter 12:2, there are three heavens (like time zones or vertical time), each one higher than the other . Do colliding spiral galaxies become one bigger spiral galaxy? How they collide can tell us something about the divine pattern. God stretches out the heaven like a canopy or tent. Is this like saying that the universe is expanding? If so, what effect does the cosmological constant rate of expansion have on time? Is there an ellipse or parabola or hyperbola or catenary curve or arc that will unlock the geometry of our universe? Do black holes provide proof of a time paradox?

The shape of the universe may depend on the existence of heaven (the highest heaven). Could the need for the highest heavenly space be created? For instance, even though the shape of the fabric of space remains invisible, the quantum mechanics of light waves animate the invisible fabric of space. If quantum physics cannot exist without the physics of motion, it follows that the physics of motion cannot exist without the forces that give an action and reaction to each other. Astrophysics cannot exist without cosmology. So, cosmology cannot exist without dimensions. Dimensions cannot exist without space and space cannot exist without dimensions. The need for the highest heaven is based on this circular reasoning.

Could the cosmos, given the geometrical properties of all the galaxy clusters in the universe, be YHWH’s brain child universe? The answer is yes, according to scientists that hold to the special creation of our universe. The foundation for this view of the creation of the cosmos is provided in the account of creation in the book of Genesis. In the account of the first chapter of Genesis, the order of creation is established. The first event describes a formless cosmos and its emptiness. In that first event, there was darkness on the face of the deep. The very first dimension in the cosmos described in Genesis chapter one is DEPTH. Although, the word, deep, used in the first chapter of Genesis, refers to a body of water, it is an indication that water was in the universe. This could not happen without the dimension of depth. This leads to the question, what is the shape of space? The shape of space, according to the bible is determined by GRAVITY.

The shape of the cosmos is still unknown. However, ongoing observation of the elliptic orbit and the tilt of the axes of all celestial bodies may provide clues to the shape of, about “5 percent” of the observable universe.1 Perhaps one clue to the shape of the observable part of our universe can be found in the tilt and orbit of each planet, providing the appearance of a torus shape (curving cylindrical ring or motion of a planet’s complete revolution around our moving sun). As the planets make revolutions around their moving sun, the observation of their curving cylindrical revolutions has been determined. It has been observed that within the galaxies in our universe there are solar systems making revolutions around other solar systems called binary and ternary star systems. If all these binary or ternary stars were the same size it would look like a cylindrical line was being formed by the joining of these star systems. The pattern of cylindrical scroll shaped links, some smaller, others larger can also emerge. They might appear to be the shape of an inward spiraling scroll. This scroll shape is forming by the orbiting motion (2D inward spiraling shape of a rolled up scroll) of all the planets moving together with the sun at the center moving to animate the shape. This background animation can be used because the solar system is HELIOCENTRIC (Psalms 19:6). It can also be thought of as an invisible trail of energy.

Do some galaxies follow a spiraling pattern? If there are two arms in our spiral galaxy, say, an inner arm and outer arm in the Milky Way galaxy, two hypothetical spiraling patterns can be used to illustrate the idea of an inward spiraling pattern of motion. Each spiral arm would interact with the other at the center. For instance, the outer arm of a spiral galaxy would be where the hypothetical moving quadrilateral shape would follow the hypothetical ratio of the square root of 5 plus 1 over or divided by 2 that results in the phi number sequence of 1.6180339887 to “1e18 km” (kilometer distance of the Milky Way galaxy across according to N.A.S.A.).2 Starting from the bottom, the outer arm of the Milky Way galaxy would spiral inward towards the center, moving from the left to the right. The inner arm would be where the ratio of about phi to “1e18 km” (kilometer distance of the Milky Way galaxy across according to N.A.S.A.) is and would spiral inward, right to left.2 Depending on geometric orientation, the inner and outer spiral arms can seem to be moving from right to left or left to right as if the geometric reflection was unfolding past, present and future. This serves as the illustration of time as being rolled up in an inward spiraling pattern. Also, to envision this, one can reference the shape of the nautilus shell.

If our universe an equidistant shape, then it stands to reason that the hypothetical background animation shape (a trail of invisible energy like a long exposure picture taken of a galaxy over billions of light years) may form some kind of a curve or arc which may be similar to our universe’s curve. There may be a pattern of curves from celestial bodies close to the celestial equator leading to a point near enough to the universe’s surface so as to still be visible. However, using this approach is challenging because, “the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light,” according to Dr Don Lincoln.3 For instance, if the universe has an infinitely sided polygon shape or a spherical one with equidistance and congruence properties, the space in it should also be expanding at a constant but not variable rate. According to Dr. Don Lincoln’s explanation of the expansion of space being faster than light, “galaxies are stationary or nearly stationary with respect to their own space.3 It is unknown whether the celestial bodies’ shapes or the appearance of their shapes could change to accommodate this spatial expansion.

For instance, the fabric of space was shaped by the gravity of YHWH’s spiritual mass when He warped it by moving on its face or surface, creating black holes. This is somewhat similar to 2π Radians/10^∞ < 2π Radians•10^∞ or 2π Rad•10^∞ > 2π Rad/10^∞. This would depend on the diameter or circumference getting bigger or smaller similar to 2π Rad•10^∞/1 unit radian or 2π Rad/1 unit Rad•10^∞. The point of origin is being coalesced or expanded by use of this inequality. If the diameter is getting bigger, you need radians to measure the smaller unit circle. On the other hand, the bigger the circumference gets, you need a cosmological constant to measure the rate of circumference expansion, hypothetically speaking, for a spherical universe. I postulate this because all galaxies are recessing outward and away from each other, which is measured by a cosmological constant energy expansion. This is known by the red shift of light discernible by the Doppler Effect. This is why I postulate that YHWH’s brain-child universe may have a certain shape. I base this reasoning on the ability to test the shape of the universe. One way to test what I’m postulating would be to test the equidistant geometric property of a hypothetical equidistant shaped universe.

The implication for the outcome that such an experiment will have on humanity would be to serve as a great help to finally be able to determine just what is ABSOLUTE NORTH, ABSOLUTE SOUTH, ABSOLUTE EAST, AND ABSOLUTE WEST, giving us a hypothetical cosmic compass. This is important for knowing where to place radian points on a unit circle to determine distance between latitude and longitude degrees across the vertical line of the celestial equator or horizontal line of the celestial equator of the universe. Could gravity be considered to correspond to the vertical line of the celestial equator of the universe? This can be assumed if gravity is the indication of depth within the fabric of space-time. If it can be proven that all black holes were formed at the same time, that would serve as an example of a hypothetical cosmic compass that always points to depth, which is somewhat similar to a navigational compass that always points to the strongest magnetic field. This is also helpful in considering how to go about calculating the degree of the shadow of the darkness of space named, THE DARK MATTER.

One experiment that may be done to find out the hypothetical equidistant shape of our universe is to find a way to measure the segment distance from our planetary spherical point to the center of our universe and measure the distance from the center of our hypothetical equidistant universe to its opposite surface edge of space. Using adding and/or subtracting geometry segment theorems will serve to check the congruence of those segments. For instance, subtracting the segment from our planet to the center of the universe from the length of the other segment originating from one surface of the universe and ending at the opposite surface of our hypothetical equidistant shaped universe, should give us a length difference, that, when added to the length of the segment originating from our planetary point to the center of the universe, should equal the distance of any surface edge segment and it’s opposite surface edge in an equidistant shaped universe. This could be accurate only if the segments are truly congruent. Moreover, the congruence of the segments can prove the hypothetical equidistant relationship those segments share.

For now, we know the estimated age of our universe in light years which is “13.7 billion light years” according to N.A.S.A..4 One way to test the light year measurement accuracy may be to send light out from our planet through the universe and return it to the original source of the light emission on our planet. If one light year is equal to the total number of kilometers light travels per Earth second, then, hypothetically, all one need to do is make calculations to get the answer for the total number of light years of the universe. There may be a set back to this approach. For instance, if the light second is based on the constant speed of light in kilometers per Earth second, this might create a time paradox. This is because the Earth second is not based on the atomic clock of the hydrogen atom, supposedly, the most abundant element in the cosmos (1 Cor 15:41). Hydrogen atoms may be like LOCI POINTS. That may help to illustrate equidistance of radii for a universe with space-time congruence. If the Earth second is based on a different atomic clock, that element could never be used to test equidistance because it doesn’t account for the most abundant element in the universe, namely hydrogen. Still, it will certainly be helpful to do this once distance in all directions can be calculated. If these light year measurements are found to be consistent, meaning they were taken from all the most powerful telescopes around the world, that might serve to help humanity determine just how near Earth is to the center or joined foci points at center of the universe. It is important to know this because this might help to determine space-time congruence.

If there is such a thing as space-time congruence, that may help to determine if a time paradox could theoretically be proven to be a possibility. This is why I state there is no reason to doubt the 6 days of creation from the bible narrative in the first chapter of Genesis. The reason for this is because very little can be scientifically known regarding YHWH’s light. His light started on the first day of creation. Whereas, the stellar light started on the fourth day of creation. YHVH’s light rested on the beginning of the seventh day which was the end of the sixth day while the stellar light He created keeps aging in light years. YHVH’s light does not age the same way as stellar light. A day with Him is as a thousand years and vice versa (100,000% increase or decrease in time). His light can be much younger than the stellar light in the universe because He could have used His limitless supply of gravity to pull one end of the fabric of space-time into the other end of the fabric of space-time. There exists the possibility this was done in order to move very great distances throughout space as well as to separate darkness from light or DARK TIME FROM LIGHT TIME. A black hole uses gravitational lensing to separate light from darkness. This may be one of the ways YHVH separated light from darkness (Genesis 1:4). Another way that may be considered as proof that YHVH separated light from darkness is the cosmological constant expansion of the universe. Black holes do slow down time and can be considered as proof of a space-time paradox because black holes are still separating dark time from light time. This could, in turn, affect the amount of measurable cosmic background radiation. EINSTEIN’S GENERAL RELATIVITY THEORY PROVED THAT GRAVITY DOES SLOW DOWN TIME. Moreover, if the presence of blue shifting of light, caused by the Doppler Effect, was observed in our galaxy and our closest neighbor galaxy, that would help to determine that there are some galaxies moving closer toward each other while other galaxies are moving further away from each other. This serves as an example of a space-time paradox. If the universe is not congruent, why does E=MC^2?

Can Einstein’s twin paradox from the special theory of relativity be used to show that Jesus’ time could be different from our time? If Jesus was traveling at the speed of light through the universe after leaving Earth with Earth time being the same for Him and humanity, on His return trip at the speed of light, He would appear younger. For instance, the first Adam (created by YHWH) is from the earth (below) and the second Adam (YHWH in the flesh) is from Heaven (outer space or above). The first coming of Jesus to this world through the virgin birth and the taking out of this world by Jesus all the elect of YHWH, first those who died, then those alive (from the first Adam created by YHVH up until all those elect living at the time of the catching away), can be used as an example of the twin paradox. This is imaginable because we all receive our glorified bodies at about the same time. However, Jesus transfigured Himself at the mountain of transfiguration to prove Jesus’ glorified body preceded all, from the first Adam (created by YHWH) to all of the first Adam’s descendants.

It should become more clear, with the use of vertical or horizontal time, that time could be paradoxical. When the shape of the universe is used, it becomes increasingly plain to see that. For instance, say the shape of the universe was spherical, any deviation of time from the center or point of origin will affect the measurement of time. This is because the diameter of the sphere needs to be used to ensure time corresponds to the sphere’s equidistant measurement property. If a circle plane (similar to line segment chord for a circle) that goes through any other part of the sphere other than through the center is used, then the dome base time is less than the diameter time. In other words, there will be a length difference between the diameter line segment and the line segment chords of the universes’ time within the diameter length parameter of the hypothetical spherical universe. In order to preserve the integrity of the equidistant diameter length parameter, the cosmological constant can be used. It can be used to measure the expansion of the universe from the center of the sphere and from its surface to make certain the equidistant time expansion stays constant in all directions. Irregular circle time within a sphere is defined as chords that have beginning and ending points on opposite surface areas of a sphere with go-around distances (forming domes surfaces). These are quantifiable when taken into account the amount of times vertical and/or horizontal perpendicular and parallel line segment chords can be made in a sphere (chords per cubic units or chord density). All the irregular circular go-around distances can be added together to get the total irregular circular go-around distance of the sphere. This total, in turn, can be subtracted from the sphere’s circumference to contrast irregular circular time to circular time. It’s like looking for ring area in ring area within a circle (bigger circle area minus smaller circle area) or the circumference of a circle in a circle within a circle (bigger circumference minus smaller circumference). This can be done by decreasing the diameter units down to one unit (even down to the Max Planck length. Each parallel and perpendicular chord inside the sphere can be counted as 1 degree apart and equal to 360 degrees for a sphere. This is because it cuts the sphere into spherical surface area caps that are small and smaller in squared lengths as the parallel and perpendicular chords are positioned further away from center of the sphere. If the irregular circular orbits in space that astronomers observe are elliptical orbits (instance of irregular circle), that would mean that we are not at the celestial equator of the universe where circular time on a vertical or horizontal axis can be observed, within a hypothetical spherical universe. On the other hand, at the celestial equator, one circle on the y or x axis can be rotated 360 degrees, 1 degree for each circle with a diameter passing through the celestial equator. The total for these circles is 360, making up the circular time in the universe. These are all instances of the different parts of a sphere in relation to irregular and/or circular time. In short, this proves that within a spherical universe, time can be paradoxical.

The relationships that different parts of a sphere share need to be explored in order to relate to the idea of space-time equidistance and congruence. With respect to how the universe looks for the most efficient shape the most relatable parts of a sphere are it’s circle area and sphere surface area. This approach is useful to gain a little understanding of the need for the universe to expand. Circle area can be divided into a sphere’s surface area. A relationship between circle area and sphere surface area can be illustrated with the following inequality 4πr^2/1 > πr^2/1, or ratio 4:1 or reverse order 1:4. This may be similar to coterminal angles 720 degrees and 180 degrees, where 720 degrees – X = 180 degrees. Or 720 degrees = 180 degrees + X. Or 720 degrees – 180 degrees = X. The final answer is 540 degrees. This can also be done in reverse order for the ratio 1:4 (180 degrees + X = 720 degrees. The preceding examples prove that circle area needs to be 4 times more than itself to be equal to sphere surface area when the radius is the same value for sphere as it is for the circle. With the used values below, the answer is 4 when circle area is divided into sphere surface area. To check dividend answer 4, circle area can be multiplied by preceding dividend answer 4 to obtain sphere surface area below.

Circle area can as well be divided into volume of sphere when the radius for circle area and sphere are the same. This would be like finding out how many circle area bases (like levels or slices) there are per sphere volume to look for sphere density. An oversimplified view of how a sphere’s density can affect its shape is by representing a circle area with same diameter as that of a sphere and that same sphere’s volume as a fraction. This fraction should have as its numerator the circle area and as its denominator the sphere volume. Dividing the sphere’s volume into a bigger circle area numerator should give the quotient a remainder. This approach is necessary when determining the center mass of the universe. Could celestial body density help to explain how many degrees a body in space tilts on its axis? How would this affect its shape if it’s center of mass was not perfectly situated at its center? For instance, if the center mass of the universe was not located exactly at the celestial equator, would that change the angle of the universes’ expansion?

- Cubed sphere volume units/Squared circle area units = 93,333,333,333.35069 squared circle area units per sphere volume
- The above answer can be written as sphere density = sphere volume / circle area or 93,333,333,333.35069^2 = 1.436755040242e33^3 / 1.539380400259e22^2

Fractional cubes is important to further one’s understanding of fractional parts of each part of the sphere. In other words, this allows a sphere’s symmetry to be examined when trying to make relatable the different parts of the sphere. The following parts of their equations can be made relatable with respect to each other so as not to compromise their equality. According to Sal Khan, it is possible to measure volume of a rectangular prism with “fractional cubes” (length over one third, width over one third, height over one third)5. By this reasoning, my question is can a sphere be measured in fractions? The following data is documented to show my approach to this. Circle area equals 3.141592653589793 / 1.047197551196598 • (r/1.047197551196598)^2 = square units/1.047197551196598 (denominators are not simplified and answer is given with 1/3π as denominator). Volume of sphere equals 4.188790204786391/1.047197551196598•(r/1.047197551196598)^3 = cube units/1.047197551196598 (denominators are not simplified and answer is given with 1/3π as denominator). Note that the amount of fractional volume can be obtained by multiplying the exponential product for dimensions “1•1•1” with volume according to Sal Khan.5 In order to make sphere volume and circle area equal, they can be multiplied and given as a denominator their product. Cross multiplication can then be done to prove they are relatable without compromising their values.

- 1/3π = 1.047197551196598
- 1/3π radians•180/π = 60°/1 • π/180
- 4/3π = 4.188790204786391
- 4/3π radians•180/π = 240°/1 • π/180
- Radius squared equals 4.9e21
- Radius cubed equals 3.43e32

There is a relationship I believe that exists between sphere volume and volume of a sphere’s diameter when its diameter can be modified to the shape of an inward-spiraling-cylinder. It can be constructed from the length of the diameter. The length of the diameter can be defined as the height for a rolled-up-scroll. The diameter for the base can be calculated using the Planck Length. Let the Planck length value determine how much the inward-spiraling-cylinder can be compressed into a rolled-up-form. These are the smallest possible antipodal points that a hypothetical spherical universe may contain and is connected by a 2-d rolled-up-Planck-length-line (3-d inward spiraling cylinder) that serves as a diameter. When the infinite quantity of 2-d diameter lines are flat like a rectangle, the sphere must expand to stay proportional to the size and shape of such a diameter. When all the 2-d rectangular-diameter-lines are rolled up into an inward spiraling 3-d shape, it can accommodate a shrinking diameter width along with a universe that is being coalesced.

- Universe circumference 439,822,971,502.5711Λ
- Universe circumference 439,822,971,502.5711 • Planck width -1.6e35 = flat torus -7.037167544041E46
- (1.4e11 • 1.6E-35) + (arc 1.954768762233E-26 – Planck width 1.6E-35) + (arc 1.954768762233E-26 – Planck width 1.6E-35) = 2d diameter line with arc ends -2.24E46
- Diameter height 1.4e11 • Planck width 1.6E-35 = -2.24E46
- Circumference fraction 1.6E-35/360 or 4.444444444444E-38 • 439,822,971,502.5711 = arc 1.954768762233E-26
- 2-d Diameter line-opposite-ends-arc-length = arc 1.954768762233E-26 – Planck Length 1.6E-35 = -1.954768762233E26
- Planck length = “1.6E-35“ (W.C.6) = radius
- Planck length square root = -2.262741699797E35
- π•r square root = negative circle area base = -7.108612701054e35 square root units
- Torus smaller Planck radius circumference -1.005309649149E36 • bigger universe circumference 439,822,971,502.5711 = Torus volume -4.421582771689E47

If the universe was 12 to 14 billion light years old, that could be represented as 5 percent or .05 (1.4e11•20 times more=2.8e11 light and dark years total) of the visible part of the universe. All the following values are based on the preceding 2.8e11 total for light and dark years (L-arks). The 5% 1.4e11 light surface area arc can be a fraction of the sphere surface area 18°/360° or 1/20 • sphere surface area = 3.078760800518e21^2.

- 5 percent of 360 degrees is 18 degrees
- The radian conversion equation is 360/1•π/180°
- Degree conversion equation is 2π•180°/π
- The diameter is 1.4e11 light years across
- The radius is 7e10 light years across
- Circle area is 1.539380400259e22^2
- The sphere volume is 1.436755040242e33^3
- The circumference is 439,822,971,502.5711
- The sphere surface area is 6.157521601036e22^2

One way to check that the percentages are correct is by converting 18° to radians (radian fractions) which equals π•Rad/10. 360°/18° = 20 and 180°/18°=10. 20/10•π/1 = 20•π•Rad/10=2πRadians/1=2πRadians. Or you can cross divide the top left side and the bottom right side by 180 to get 2πRadians. This proves the percentages are correct.

The length of that 5 percent minor arc (small arc) is 18º = π/10 = 0.314159265358979 theta. Θ • radius = s (0.314159265358979•7e^10 = 21,991,148,575.12855 arc length). An additional instance is the black hole event horizon. If its rings of light are oriented vertically and horizontally, the cosmological constant rate of expansion of space may expand it under the inverse square force created by gravity (a flat 3-D dome with the point at middle representing the first position and the base of 3-D dome representing the expansion of it like a “wheel in the middle of a wheel” Ezekiel 1:16 KJB). How much g force from a black hole will determine how much curved space is being contained in it. Imagine a very awkward looking ∞ (an oblate warped and contorted sphere) where the left part of the ∞ is very small and the right part of the ∞ (an oblate warped and contorted sphere) is very disproportionately bigger in comparison to the left. To make this shape, the 18 degrees smaller surface spherical arc squared would share the same 7 degrees coterminal angle with the 342 degrees bigger spherical surface area arc squared and move clockwise to get negative values decreasing the diameter until the diameter becomes negative. This is plausible if radius = small arc/7°Θ (see values below). The value can change if coterminal sides go in the counter clockwise direction giving positive values until EQUILIBRIUM between L-arks is reached, filling the total surface area of space (6.157521601036e22), hypothetically. The hypothetical expansion for the sphere would be a ratio of 1:4 for circle area squared to reach EQUILIBRIUM with sphere surface area squared. This would depend on the light arc degree that represents the universe being 180º:720º (4π Radians) arc length or it being 25% of 100% of the cosmos. Going by YHVH’s time paradox where one day is as one thousand years and a thousand years is like a day, the radius would be 1/4 of 2.8e12 light years squared (2.8 e12 light and dark years is 1000% > 1.4e10 light years). This would change the measurement of time by a ratio of 1000:1 (or 1:1000) or coterminal angles can go on in a negative clockwise direction 1000 times less from the coterminal shared side or can go on in a positive counter clockwise direction from the shared coterminal side 1000 times more. See above circle area to sphere surface area inequality.

- s = radius when Θ is 7° or π/25.71428571428571 or 0.122173047639603 and is divided into s to get radius
- s = radius when Θ is 18° or π/10 or 0.314159265358979 and is divided into s to get radius
- s/r = arc length per radius
- s arc length = 8,552,113,334.772216
- s arc length = 21,991,148,575.12853
- Θ theta angle = 18°
- Θ theta angle of radian = 7°
- s/Θ = r

JESUS is the light of the world as well as the light that took the universe from darkness to light (John 1:5). Jesus could measure light for YHVH (1 John 1:5). Jesus could have used light surface area arcs (Job 26:10) to measure light (circumference/2)/radius = pi arc 3.141592653589794 ~ 3.141592653589793) in spheroidal surface area of the cosmos. If sphere surface light arcs can be proved useful to reconstruct the shape of the universe using the relationship between light arcs and spherical light surface area, the following calculation provided can be used to obtain fractions of sphere – surface – area – light – arc – length squared. It is (alpha-omega arc degree/360) • sphere surface area. All energy is subject to YHVH. Therefore, God has His own divine laws that can bridge the higher dimension of heaven to outer space to the quantum realm. DP=DEΛ/T where DP stands for dark power; DE stands for dark energy; Lamda or Λ stands for cosmological constant displacement; T stands for arc time. The radian is another instance of YHVH’s powerful arm and wondrous work. It can be calculated using s=Θ·r where s=arc, Θ=radian/π or rad per π, and r =radius. To convert degrees to radian, the following conversion tool is used (π/180°)(Job 26:10). To calculate the radian the following examples are provided (390°/180°)π = 13π/6 radians = 2.166666666666667 = Θ and (7°/180°)π = 0.122173047639603 radians = Θ. Now we can plug theta or Θ values into the arc formula. s = (13π/6 theta)•(7e10 radius) = 151,666,666,666.6667π = 476,474,885,794.452 arc length. s = (7π/180 theta)•(7e10 radius) = 8,552,113,334.77221π = 26,867,256,425.18768. See below.

- Sphere sector volume minus 30°-60°-90° triangle modified with cubed volume (pyramid) = sphere volume difference (a fraction where the numerator is volume difference and total sphere volume is denominator like a modified circle segment for a sphere).
- Sphere sector volume = (60°/360°) • sphere volume or 1/6 • sphere volume = 2.394591733737E32^3
- 30°:60°:90° pyramid x : x•(√3) : 2x = 3.5e10 : 7e10•(√3) : 7e10
- [7e10•(√3)]^2 = 1.47E22 pyramid base
- 1/3 • pyramid base 1.47E22 • pyramid height 3.5e10 = 1.715E32
- Sphere sector volume 2.394591733737E32^3 – pyramid volume 1.715E32^3 = 6.79591733737E31^3
- 90 degree right dome = 1/2 radius base 3.5e10 • radius height 7e10 • (radius 7e10 + radius 7e10 multiplied by the arc curve .0471975511965) = 1.795943800302e32^3
- # 7 is the same answer as 1.436755040242e33^3 • 1/8 or 1.436755040242e33^3/8 = 1.795943800302E32^3
- 2D 90° right dome = (1/2 • radius base or 3.5e10 ) + radius height 7e10 + (45°/360° or 1/8 • circumference or 54,977,871,437.82139 arc length) = 159,977,871,437.8214 2D 90° right dome length
- Torus smaller Planck radius circumference -1.005309649149E36 • bigger universe circumference 439,822,971,502.5711 = Torus volume -4.421582771689E47

12 There is no sitting above (in heaven), neither is there eating, drinking, sleep, multiplication, animosity, hatred, provocation, envy, nor stubbornness, weariness nor delay, and that is what David the King of Israel said [ibid. xviii. 12]: “He made darkness his hiding-place” (i.e., it is dark and hidden to all mortals). To what end did David say this? To none other than to praise of the Holy One, blessed be He, who is “Yah,” rules on high, whose unity is one, whose name is one, and who rests in three hundred and ninety heavens, and on each His name and mode of pronunciation are marked; and in each of them there are servants, seraphim, ophanim (wheels, Ezek. I.), cherubim, galgalim, and a throne of glory; and there is no wonder at that, for even as a mortal king has many palaces for the seasons of the year, so much the more the Everlasting, since all is His. And when Israel are doing His will, He rests in the seventh heaven, named Araboth, and does not keep distant from His world, as it is written [Numb. vii. 89]: “From between the two cherubim: and thus he spake unto him.” When offended He ascends to the highest heaven, and all cries and weeping are not listened to, and fasts are ordered, and they roll themselves in ashes, cover themselves with sacks, and shed tears (and all in vain, until He has mercy upon them).7 (Rab 2:12 ROD)

This challenges evolution. I say this because it seems easier to believe in a creator than to believe in evolution. For instance, how can evolutionists explain a universe that is very slowly starting to wake up and become aware of itself, that is, if humans are really just a collection of atoms looking into outer space (the universe observing itself). To make matters even more complicated, the collections of atoms evolutionists call humans sent Voyager One to look for signs of intelligent life (the universe eventually awake, aware, and searching for itself as if it has lost itself).

Accessed Websites

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/2_corinthians/12-2.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/colossians/1-16.htm

http://biblehub.com/proverbs/25-3.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/romans/11-36.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/isaiah/37-16.htm

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/job/26-7.htm (THE WEIGHTLESSNESS OF SPACE)

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/isaiah/40-22.htm (TWO DIMENSIONAL SHAPE OF THREE DIMENSIONAL EARTH)

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/job/26-10.htm (HORIZON)

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/john/8-14.htm (MUCH OF THE SCIENCE OF COSMOLOGY UNKNOWN)

https://www.britannica.com/science/latitude

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/isaiah/22-18.htm (THE EARTH IS NOT A TOY AND IS WHY IT IS NOT USED TO DESCRIBE SHAPE OF THE EARTH)

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/amos/5-8.htm (ROTATION ALLOWING NIGHT AND DAY)

https://www.studylight.org/lexicons/hebrew/2015.html

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/ephesians/4-10.htm (COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT)

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/genesis/28-12.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/genesis/28-13.htm

http://www.studylight.org/lexicons/greek/gwview.cgi?n=455

http://biblehub.com/job/38-31.htm

http://biblehub.com/job/9-9.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/acts/17-28.htm

http://m.studylight.org/lexicons/greek/gwview.cgi?n=2795

http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_accel.html

http://biblehub.com/genesis/1-4.htm

https://www.britannica.com/topic/binary-star

https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-Herschel

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/psalms/19-6.htm

http://m.studylight.org/lexicons/hebrew/hwview.cgi?n=8622

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/isaiah/34-4.htm

http://m.studylight.org/lexicons/hebrew/hwview.cgi?n=5612

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/isometry

http://www.britannica.com/science/accretion

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/ezekiel/1-16.htm

http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/blue_shift.aspx

https://www.britannica.com/science/gravitational-wave

https://www.britannica.com/topic/linear-transformation

http://www.britannica.com/science/Doppler-effect

http://www.britannica.com/technology/quartz-crystal-clock

http://www.britannica.com/science/light-year

https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/ellipse.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/einsteins-theory-is-proved-and-it-is-bad-news-if-you-own-a-penthouse-2088195.html

http://www.britannica.com/science/time-dilation

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hubbles-law

http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/laser/en/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/light-day

http://biblehub.com/genesis/1-4.htm

https://www.studylight.org/lexicons/hebrew/996.html

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/hebrews/11-3.htm

https://www.studylight.org/lexicons/greek/2675.html

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/job/38-4.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/john/1-5.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/psalms/29-7.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/psalms/18-10.htm

http://biblehub.com/ezekiel/10-16.htm

Works Cited

1.Dr Nagaraja, Mamta Patel. “Dark Energy, Dark Matter,” Universe, (Last Updated March 15,2019), Accessed March 15, 2019, https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy

2.Newman, Phil. “The Milky Way Galaxy,” Imagine The Universe, December 2015, (Last Updated Oct 4, 2017), Accessed March 15,2019, https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/objects/milkyway1.html

3.Dr. Lincoln, Don, How to travel faster than light (Video). Fermilab. Accessed May 21, 2019. https://youtu.be/BhG_QZl8WVY

4.Newman, Phil. “StarChild Question of the Month for December 2000,” How old is the universe?, December 2000, Accessed March 15, 2019, https://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question28.html

5.Khan, Sal, Volume of a rectangular prism: “fractional cubes” (video). Khan Academy. Accessed March 10, 2019. https://www.khanacademy.org/math/basic-geo/basic-geo-volume-sa/volume-with-fractions/v/volume-of-a-rectangular-prism-with-fractional-cubes.

6.Wolfe, Joe. “Relativity in brief….or in detail.” The Planck scale: relativity meets quantum mechanics meets gravity, Accessed March 25, 2019, https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/module6_credits.htm

7.Rodkinson, Michael L. New Edition of the Babylonian Talmud: Original Text, Edited, Corrected, Formulated and Translated into English (ROD). Rabah 2:12. 20 vols. Boston: The Talmud Society, 1918. BibleWorks, v.8.

Videography

Dash, Arddhendu Shekhar, Volume of Sphere: “Derivation of formula for volume of sphere using volume of pyramid.” Accessed March 29, 2019. https://youtu.be/xJuY0QT0Z8M.

Bibliography

Parker, Barry. Science 101 First Ed: Physics. Irvington: Harper Collins, 2007

62a Chicago Bibliography Entries

Rodkinson, Michael L. New Edition of the Babylonian Talmud: Original Text, Edited, Corrected, Formulated and Translated into English (ROD). 20 vols. Boston: The Talmud Society, 1918. BibleWorks, v.8.

Ryan, Mark. Geometry For Dummies 2nd Edition. Indiana: Wiley Publishing, 2008

Suggested Reading

Comfort, Ray Scientific Facts in the Bible. Alachua: Bridge-Logos, 2001