© OJG 3rd and sonofgodwordsoul.com, 2013 Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material, digital images and/or photos without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to OJG 3rd sonofgodwordsoul.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Is There a Divine Pattern?

What is the shape of our universe? Why do many celestial bodies in space seem to favor spherical geometry? In order to make this determination, one would need to find the pattern of all the celestial bodies moving through space. Can gravity’s warping effect of space-time be taken into account for determining the shape of space-time? If space-time has an added fourth dimension, what would that look like when considering what shape is the most efficient for it? A LOCI PATTERN should emerge where each solar system curves by virtue of its orbit around another. Are there different time zones in the universe? If there are different time zones in our universe, can those time zones affect our measurement of time? According to the Bible in 2nd Corinthians chapter 12:2, there are three heavens (like time zones or vertical time), each one higher than the other . Do colliding spiral galaxies become one bigger spiral galaxy? How they collide can tell us something about the divine pattern. God stretches out the heaven like a canopy or tent. Is this like saying that the universe is expanding? How would that affect our understanding of its shape? What effect does the cosmological constant rate of expansion have on time? Is there an ellipse or parabola or hyperbola or catenary curve or arc that will unlock the geometry of our universe? Do black holes provide proof of a time paradox?

The shape of the universe may depend on the existence of heaven (the highest heaven). Could there be a need for the highest heavenly space? The answer is yes because it is part of the dimensions that make up the shape of space. For instance, atomic particles cannot exist without subatomic particles. Similarly, molecules cannot exist without atoms. Matter cannot exist without chains of molecules. Likewise, cosmology cannot exist without astrophysics. In addition, cosmology is dependent to a certain degree on dimensions. These are all dependent on one another.

Could the cosmos, be YHWH’s brain-child-creation? The answer is yes, according to scientists that hold to the special creation of our universe. The foundation for this view of the creation of the cosmos is provided in the account of creation in the book of Genesis. In the account of the first chapter of Genesis, the order of creation is established. The first event states that the heavens and the earth were created; this is close to stating that space and matter were in the universe by divine intervention. There was no shape of the earth matter in the cosmos and it was empty. This is where dimensions come into being. In that first event, there was darkness on the surface of the deep. This could be an indication that a shape was not visible during this event. That is, until the very first dimension in the cosmos is described in Genesis chapter one. That dimension is DEPTH. Although, the word, deep, used in the first chapter of Genesis, refers to a deep body of water, it is an indirect application to matter filling space as volume fills a shape in geometry. Depth was in the universe. The idea of the warping of matter in space starts to emerge with the addition of light to water and earth. It is well known that heat turns solids to liquids to gasses to plasma. Without heat, it is difficult to warp matter. This could not happen without the dimension of depth. To have the dimension of depth, there must be length and width. This leads to the question, what is the shape of space? The shape of space, according to the Bible is determined by GRAVITY.

The shape of the cosmos is still unknown. However, ongoing observation of the shape of the orbit of all celestial bodies may provide clues to the shape of, about “5 percent” of the observable universe.**1** Perhaps one clue to the shape of the observable part of our universe can be found in the trail of energy for each planet’s orbit. If the motion of the orbit was circular, it might resemble a torus shape (curving cylindrical ring or motion of a planet’s revolution around its sun). On the other hand, if the motion of the orbit was elliptical, it would appear to have an oblate torus form. A background trail of energy (like a long exposure picture) taken of a solar system can help to illustrate this. It has been observed that within the galaxies in our universe there are solar systems making revolutions around other solar systems called binary and ternary star systems. If all these binary or ternary stars were the same size, the long exposure picture would look like a cylindrical curving line was being formed by the proximity of distance that each star system has to another. This background animation can be used to contribute to a basic understanding of what geometry the universe contains. The solar system is HELIOCENTRIC (Psalms 19:6) as well as many other solar systems. A center mass such as a sun in a solar system is something to take into consideration when looking at the universes’ geometric properties.

Do some galaxies follow a spiraling pattern? If there are two arms in our spiral galaxy, say, an inner arm and outer arm in the Milky Way galaxy, two hypothetical spiraling patterns can be used to illustrate the idea of an inward spiraling pattern of motion. Each spiral arm would interact with the other at the center. For instance, the outer arm of a spiral galaxy would be where the hypothetical moving quadrilateral shape would follow the hypothetical ratio of the square root of 5 plus 1 over or divided by 2 that results in the phi number sequence of 1.6180339887 to “1e18 km” (kilometer distance of the Milky Way galaxy across according to N.A.S.A.).**2** Starting from the bottom, the outer arm of the Milky Way galaxy would spiral inward towards the center, moving from the left to the right. The inner arm would be where the ratio of about phi to “1e18 km” (kilometer distance of the Milky Way galaxy across according to N.A.S.A.) is and would spiral inward, right to left.**2** Depending on geometric orientation, the inner and outer spiral arms can seem to be moving from right to left or left to right as if the geometric reflection was unfolding past, present and future.

Another thing to consider is the merging of two galaxies. The Milky Way and the Andromeda galaxies will be merging together after they collide. The following is a quote of the announcement of the collision between them. “NASA astronomers announced Thursday they can now predict with certainty the next major cosmic event to affect our galaxy, sun, and solar system: the titanic collision of our Milky Way galaxy with our neighboring Andromeda galaxy.”**3** When two galaxies merge together, the new figure that is formed, in part, is the result of the coalescence of celestial objects. The curving outline of two rectangles with the phi ratio adds to the understanding of how curved lines can form 3D shapes. For instance, if height or depth is given to the two rectangles in the phi ratio, a cone or funnel shape may start to emerge. By contrast, if height of depth is taken away from a sphere, it can become an oblate sphere. An oblate sphere is a 3-D object. The 2-D version of an oblate sphere would be an ellipse. The following quote speaks to the reoccurrence of this geometric pattern. “Computer simulations derived from Hubble’s data show that it will take an additional two billion years after the encounter for the interacting galaxies to completely merge under the tug of gravity and reshape into a single elliptical galaxy similar to the kind commonly seen in the local universe.”**3** This speaks to the coalescing geometric property of the universe. This serves as the illustration of how objects in space might affect each other’s curving forms. Also, to envision a phi pattern, one can reference the shape of the nautilus shell.

Does the universe have the geometric property of efficiency? If it did, then what might that be? One need look no further than the geometric properties of equidistance and congruence. If our universe has an equidistant shape, then it stands to reason that the hypothetical background animation shape (a trail of invisible energy like a long exposure picture taken of a galaxy over billions of light years) may form some kind of an efficient curve or arc which may be similar to our universe’s curve. There may be a pattern of curves from galaxies or celestial bodies close enough to the celestial equator and that lead to a point proximate to the universe’s surface so as to still be visible. However, using this approach is challenging because, “the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light,” according to Dr Don Lincoln.**4** For instance, if the universe has an infinitely sided polygon shape or a spherical one with equidistance and congruence properties, the space in it should also be expanding at a constant but not variable rate. According to Dr. Don Lincoln’s explanation of the expansion of space being faster than light, “galaxies are stationary or nearly stationary with respect to their own space.3 It is unknown whether the celestial bodies’ shapes or the appearance of their shapes could change to accommodate this spatial expansion.

For instance, the fabric of space was shaped by the gravity of YHWH’s spiritual mass when He warped it by moving on its face or surface, creating black holes. This is somewhat similar to 2π Radians/10^∞ < 2π Radians•10^∞ or 2π Rad•10^∞ > 2π Rad/10^∞. This would depend on the diameter or circumference getting bigger or smaller similar to 2π Rad•10^∞/1 unit radian or 2π Rad/1 unit Rad•10^∞. The point of origin is being coalesced or expanded by use of this inequality. If the diameter is getting bigger, you need radians to measure the smaller unit circle. On the other hand, the bigger the circumference gets, you need a cosmological constant to measure the rate of circumference expansion, hypothetically speaking, for a spherical universe. I postulate this because all galaxies are recessing outward and away from each other, which is measured by a cosmological constant energy expansion. This is known by the red shift of light discernible by the Doppler Effect. This is why I postulate that YHWH’s brain-child universe may have a certain shape. I base this reasoning on the ability to test the shape of the universe. One way to test what I’m postulating would be to test the equidistant geometric property of a hypothetical equidistant shaped universe.

The implication for the outcome that such an experiment will have on humanity would be to serve as a great help to finally be able to determine just what is ABSOLUTE NORTH, ABSOLUTE SOUTH, ABSOLUTE EAST, AND ABSOLUTE WEST, giving us a hypothetical cosmic compass. This is important for knowing where to place radian points on a unit circle to determine distance between latitude and longitude degrees across the vertical line of the celestial equator or horizontal line of the celestial equator of the universe. Could gravity be considered to correspond to the vertical or horizontal line of the celestial equator of the universe? It is interesting to know this because of the effect it would have upon ones understanding of the shape of the universe. For instance, if the figure of the universe was spherical, and gravity corresponded only to the vertical axis, its spherical shape would be more oblate and its go-around distance would be elliptic and irregular circular. Or, if gravity corresponded only to the horizontal axis, the sphere would be prolate and the distance around it would be irregular circular. This can be assumed if gravity is the indication of depth within the fabric of space-time. If it can be proven that all black holes were formed at the same time, that would serve as an example of a hypothetical cosmic compass that always points to depth, which is somewhat similar to a navigational compass that always points to the strongest magnetic field. This is also helpful in considering how to go about calculating the degree of the shadow of the darkness of space named, THE DARK MATTER.

One experiment that may be done to find out the hypothetical equidistant shape of our universe is to find a way to measure the segment distance from our planetary spherical point to the center of our universe and measure the distance from the center of our hypothetical equidistant universe to its opposite surface edge of space. Using adding and/or subtracting geometry segment theorems will serve to check the congruence of those segments. For instance, subtracting the segment from our planet to the center of the universe from the length of the other segment originating from one surface of the universe and ending at the opposite surface of our hypothetical equidistant shaped universe, should give us a length difference, that, when added to the length of the segment originating from our planetary point to the center of the universe, should equal the distance of any surface edge segment and it’s opposite surface edge in an equidistant shaped universe. This could be accurate only if the segments are truly congruent. Moreover, the congruence of the segments can prove the hypothetical equidistant relationship those segments share.

For now, we know the estimated age of our universe in light years which is “13.7 billion light years” according to N.A.S.A..**5** One way to test the light year measurement accuracy may be to send light out from our planet through the universe and return it to the original source of the light emission on our planet. If one light year is equal to the total number of kilometers light travels per Earth second, then, hypothetically, all one need to do is make calculations to get the answer for the total number of light years of the universe. There may be a set back to this approach. For instance, if the light second is based on the constant speed of light in kilometers per Earth second, this might create a time paradox. This is because the Earth second is not based on the atomic clock of the hydrogen atom, supposedly, the most abundant element in the cosmos (1 Cor 15:41). Hydrogen atoms may be like LOCI POINTS. That may help to illustrate equidistance of radii for a universe with space-time congruence. If the Earth second is based on a different atomic clock, that element could never be used to test equidistance because it doesn’t account for the most abundant element in the universe, namely hydrogen. Still, it will certainly be helpful to do this once distance in all directions can be calculated. If these light year measurements are found to be consistent, meaning they were taken from all the most powerful telescopes around the world, that might serve to help humanity determine just how near Earth is to the center or joined foci points at center of the universe. It is important to know this because this might help to determine space-time congruence.

If there is such a thing as space-time congruence, that may help to determine if a time paradox could theoretically be proven to be a possibility. This is why I state there is no reason to doubt the 6 days of creation from the bible narrative in the first chapter of Genesis. The reason for this is because very little can be scientifically known regarding YHWH’s light. His light started on the first day of creation. Whereas, the stellar light started on the fourth day of creation. YHVH’s light rested on the beginning of the seventh day which was the end of the sixth day while the stellar light He created keeps aging in light years. YHVH’s light does not age the same way as stellar light. A day with Him is as a thousand years and vice versa (100,000% increase or decrease in time). His light can be much younger than the stellar light in the universe because He could have used His limitless supply of gravity to pull one end of the fabric of space-time into the other end of the fabric of space-time. This could’ve been somewhat similar to an Einstein Rosen Bridge. If this is plausible, there should be observations of gravitational waves in the universe. The Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory was built to detect gravitational waves. “LIGO announced the first-ever observations of gravitational waves in 2016.”**6 **OR, YHVH COULD HAVE USED THE COSMOLOGICAL EXPANSION OF SPACE AS A WAY TO BREAK THE SPEED OF LIGHT AND CREATE HIS TIME PARADOX. In other words, it could be that He created the cosmos in His present time while simultaneously expanding it faster than the speed of light into the future. This implies that space without time has its own dark time measurable by a cosmological expansion rate.

There exists the possibility this was done in order to move very great distances throughout space as well as to separate darkness from light or DARK TIME FROM LIGHT TIME. A black hole uses gravitational lensing to separate light from darkness. This may be one of the ways YHVH separated light from darkness (Genesis 1:4). Black holes do slow down time and can be considered as proof of a space-time paradox because black holes are still separating dark time from light time. This could, in turn, affect the amount of measurable cosmic background radiation. EINSTEIN’S GENERAL RELATIVITY THEORY PROVED THAT GRAVITY DOES SLOW DOWN TIME within the context of gravitational time dilation. Another way that may be considered as proof that YHVH separated light from darkness is the cosmological constant expansion of the universe. Moreover, if the presence of blue shifting of light, caused by the Doppler Effect, was observed in our galaxy and our closest neighbor galaxy, that would help to determine that there are some galaxies moving closer toward each other while other galaxies are moving further away from each other. This serves as an example of a space-time paradox. If the universe is not congruent, why does E=MC^2?

Can Einstein’s twin paradox from the special theory of relativity be used to show that Jesus’ time could be different from our time? If Jesus was traveling at the speed of light through the universe after leaving Earth with Earth time being the same for Him and humanity, on His return trip at the speed of light, He would appear younger. For instance, the first Adam (created by YHWH) is from the earth (below) and the second Adam (YHWH in the flesh) is from Heaven (outer space or above). The first coming of Jesus to this world through the virgin birth and the taking out of this world by Jesus all the elect of YHWH, first those who died, then those alive (from the first Adam created by YHVH up until all those elect living at the time of the catching away), can be used as an example of the twin paradox. This is imaginable because we all receive our glorified bodies at about the same time. However, Jesus transfigured Himself at the mountain of transfiguration to prove Jesus’ glorified body preceded all, from the first Adam (created by YHWH) to all of the first Adam’s descendants.

It should become more clear, with the use of vertical or horizontal time, that time could be paradoxical. When the shape of the universe is used, it becomes increasingly plain to see that. For instance, say the shape of the universe was spherical, any deviation of time from the center or point of origin will affect the measurement of time. This is because the diameter of the sphere needs to be used to ensure time corresponds to the sphere’s equidistant measurement property. If a circle plane (similar to line segment chord for a circle) that goes through any other part of the sphere other than through the center is used, then the circle plane time will not have the same diameter time as the sphere it intersects. In other words, there will be a length difference between the diameter line segment and the line segment chords of the universes’ time within the diameter length parameter of the hypothetical spherical universe. In order to preserve the integrity of the equidistant diameter length parameter, the cosmological constant can be used. It can be used to measure the expansion of the universe from the center of the sphere and from its surface to make certain the equidistant time expansion stays constant in all directions.

Irregular circle time within a sphere is defined as chords that have beginning and ending points on opposite surface areas of a sphere with go-around distances (forming domes surfaces). These are quantifiable when taken into account the amount of times vertical and/or horizontal perpendicular and parallel line segment chords that can be made in a sphere (chords per cubic units or chord density). All the irregular circular go-around distances can be added together to get the total irregular circular go-around distance of the sphere. This total, in turn, can be subtracted from the sphere’s circumference to contrast irregular circular time to circular time. It’s like looking for ring area in ring area within a circle (bigger circle area minus smaller circle area) or the circumference of a circle in a circle within a circle (bigger circumference minus smaller circumference). This can be done by decreasing the diameter units down to one unit (even down to the Max Planck length. Each parallel and perpendicular chord inside the sphere can be counted as 1 degree apart and equal to 360 degrees for a sphere. This is because it cuts the sphere into spherical surface area fractions that are small and smaller in squared lengths as the parallel and perpendicular chords are positioned further away from center of the sphere. If the irregular circular orbits in space that astronomers observe are elliptical orbits (instance of irregular circle), that would mean that we are not at the celestial equator of the universe where circular time on a vertical or horizontal axis can be observed, within a hypothetical spherical universe. On the other hand, at the celestial equator, one circle on the y or x axis can be rotated 360 degrees, 1 degree for each circle with a diameter passing through the celestial equator. The total for these circles is 360, making up the circular time in the universe. These are all instances of the different parts of a sphere in relation to irregular and/or circular time. In short, this proves that within a spherical universe, time can be paradoxical.

The relationships that different parts of a sphere share need to be explored in order to relate to the idea of space-time equidistance and congruence. With respect to how the universe looks for the most efficient shape, the most relatable parts of a sphere are it’s circle area and sphere surface area. This approach is useful to gain a little understanding of the need for the universe to expand. Circle area can be divided into a sphere’s surface area. A relationship between circle area and sphere surface area can be illustrated with the following inequality 4πr^2/1 > πr^2/1, or ratio 4:1 or reverse order 1:4. The preceding examples prove that circle area needs to be 4 times more than itself to be equal to sphere surface area when the radius is the same value for sphere as it is for the circle. With the used values below, the answer is 4 when circle area is divided into sphere surface area. To check dividend answer 4, circle area can be multiplied by preceding dividend answer 4 to obtain sphere surface area below.

Circle area can as well be divided into volume of sphere when the radius for circle area and sphere are the same. This would be like finding out how many circle area bases (slices) there are per sphere volume to look for sphere density. An oversimplified view of how a sphere’s density can affect its shape is by representing a circle area with same diameter as that of a sphere and that same sphere’s volume as a fraction. This fraction should have as its numerator the circle area and as its denominator the sphere volume. Dividing the circle area into the sphere volume should give as the quotient the circle area density of the sphere. This approach is necessary when determining the center mass of the universe. Could celestial body density help to explain how many degrees a body in space tilts on its axis? How would this affect its shape if it’s center of mass was not perfectly situated at its center? Would it look more like an oblate or prolate sphere?

- Cubed sphere volume units/Squared circle area units = 93,333,333,333.35069 squared circle area units per sphere volume
- The above answer can be written as sphere density = sphere volume / circle area or 93,333,333,333.35069^2 = 1.436755040242e33^3 / 1.539380400259e22^2

Fractional cubes are important to further one’s understanding of fractional parts of each part of the sphere. In other words, this allows a sphere’s symmetry to be examined when trying to make relatable the different parts of the sphere. According to Sal Khan, it is possible to measure volume of a rectangular prism with “fractional cubes” (length over one third, width over one third, height over one third)**7**. By this reasoning, my question is can a sphere’s volume be measured with a pyramid’s volume? A sphere’s volume is four-thirds times PI multiplied by a cubed radius. The volume of a pyramid can be used to measure a sphere’s volume. The volume of a pyramid is one-third base of height with an answer given in cubed units. The base of a pyramid is a two-dimensional square. The square cube should fit inside of a sphere. A square cube has six sides. The six sides correspond to the six bases for six regular pyramids. The triangles that form the sides of each pyramid are four. The triangles are in the thirty-degree-to-sixty-degree-to-ninety-degree ratio and add to one-hundred-eighty degrees. These multiples of four triangles point the six pyramids in the cube (the six sides or bases of the six pyramids) in the sphere inward towards the center. The volume space between the curved sections of the sphere’s surface to the bottom of the six bases of the pyramids that form the cube inside the sphere need to be calculated. In order to avoid using calculus to calculate the volume between the sphere and the cube inside the sphere, a modification of circle sector area and circle segment area formulae proves necessary. My approach to this is documented below. Imagine UNRAVELING the sphere with the six pyramids pointing inwards toward the center to flatten them out onto a level flat plane in space. One would think that this is impossible but it is not. To do this, one would need to flatten out the sphere’s surface area and use (flip right side up) the five out of six pyramids to occupy the sphere surface area. The sixth pyramid can be placed onto the sphere surface area adjacent to any one of the five pyramids already unraveled using geometric netting. The picture from the post **HIGHER DIMENSIONAL BEINGS AND THE NEW JERUSALEM** can be used to help to illustrate this.

- Sphere sector volume minus 30°-60°-90° triangle modified with cubed volume (pyramid) = sphere volume difference (a fraction where the numerator is volume difference and total sphere volume is denominator like a modified circle segment for a sphere).
- Sphere sector volume = (60°/360°) • sphere volume or 1/6 • sphere volume = 2.394591733737E32^3
- 30°:60°:90° pyramid x : x•(√3) : 2x = 3.5e10 : 7e10•(√3) : 7e10
- [7e10•(√3)]^2 = 1.47E22 pyramid base
- 1/3 • pyramid base 1.47E22 • pyramid height 3.5e10 = 1.715E32
- Sphere sector volume 2.394591733737E32^3 – pyramid volume 1.715E32^3 = sphere square segment volume (like circle segment but squared) 6.79591733737E31^3

Another way of relating parts of a sphere is by making use of the right dome (similar to a curved right triangle). This triangle should help to measure a hypothetical spherical universe. This is because it follows the curve of its universe’s shape. In other words, whatever the curve of the universe is, any triangle that has a hypotenuse side can undergo a curving-line substitution for that straight line hypotenuse side. This is why it is important to know what the curve of the universe is. Depending on the geometry of the universe, the proper triangle should be used to measure it. A modification of the right triangle prism was made below in order to simplify my approach to obtaining the volume within the curved space that is outside of a right triangle prism but inside of a right dome. The answers for numbers 1 and 2 are the same as noted below and were obtained from the one-sixth sphere volume (a fractional volume of total sphere volume two paragraphs below from #7) right above from #2.

- 3D 90° right dome = 1/2 radius base 3.5e10 • radius height 7e10 • (radius 7e10 + radius 7e10 multiplied by the arc curve .396263401596) = 2.394591733737E32 cubic units
- # 1 is the same answer as 1.436755040242e33^3 • 1/6 or 1.436755040242e33^3/6 = 2.394591733737E32 cubic units
- 2D 90° right dome = (1/2 • radius base or 3.5e10 ) + radius height 7e10 + (45°/360° or 1/8 • circumference or 54,977,871,437.82139 arc length) = 159,977,871,437.8214 2D 90° right dome length

An additional relationship I believe that exists between sphere volume and volume of a sphere’s diameter when its diameter can be modified to the shape of a rectangle. It can be constructed from the length of the diameter. The length of the diameter can be defined as the height for a rolled-up-scroll. The diameter for the base can be calculated using the Planck Length. Let the Planck length value determine how much the inward-spiraling-cylinder can be compressed into a rolled-up-form. These are the smallest possible antipodal points that a hypothetical spherical universe may contain and is connected by a 2-d rolled-up-Planck-length-line (3-d inward spiraling cylinder) that serves as a diameter. When the infinite quantity of 2-d diameter lines are flat like a rectangle, the sphere must expand to stay proportional to the size and shape of such a diameter. When all the 2-d rectangular-diameter-lines are rolled up into an inward spiraling 3-d shape, it can accommodate a shrinking diameter width along with a universe that is being coalesced.

- Universe circumference 439,822,971,502.5711Λ
- Universe circumference 439,822,971,502.5711 • Planck width -1.6e35 = flat torus -7.037167544041E46
- (1.4e11 • 1.6E-35) + (arc 1.954768762233E-26 – Planck width 1.6E-35) + (arc 1.954768762233E-26 – Planck width 1.6E-35) = 2d diameter line with arc ends -2.24E46
- Diameter height 1.4e11 • Planck width 1.6E-35 = -2.24E46
- Circumference fraction 1.6E-35/360 or 4.444444444444E-38 • 439,822,971,502.5711 = arc 1.954768762233E-26
- 2-d Diameter line-opposite-ends-arc-length = arc 1.954768762233E-26 – Planck Length 1.6E-35 = -1.954768762233E26
- Planck length = “1.6E-35“ (W.C.
**8**) = radius - Planck length square root = -2.262741699797E35
- π•r square root = negative circle area base = -7.108612701054e35 square root units
- Torus smaller Planck radius circumference -1.005309649149E36 • bigger universe circumference 439,822,971,502.5711 = Torus volume -4.421582771689E47

If the universe was 12 to 14 billion light years old, that could be represented as 5 percent or .05 (1.4e11•20 times more=2.8e11 light and dark years total) of the visible part of the universe. All the following values are based on the preceding 2.8e11 total for light and dark years (L-arks). The 5% 1.4e11 light surface area arc can be a fraction of the sphere surface area 18°/360° or 1/20 • sphere surface area = 3.078760800518e21^2.

- 5 percent of 360 degrees is 18 degrees
- The radian conversion equation is 360/1•π/180°
- Degree conversion equation is 2π•180°/π
- The diameter is 1.4e11 light years across
- The radius is 7e10 light years across
- Circle area is 1.539380400259e22^2
- The sphere volume is 1.436755040242e33^3
- The circumference is 439,822,971,502.5711
- The sphere surface area is 6.157521601036e22^2
- Radius squared equals 4.9e21
- Radius cubed equals 3.43e32

One way to check that the percentages are correct is by converting 18° to radians (radian fractions) which equals π•Rad/10. 360°/18° = 20 and 180°/18°=10. 20/10•π/1 = 20•π•Rad/10=2πRadians/1=2πRadians. Or you can cross divide the top left side and the bottom right side by 180 to get 2πRadians. This proves the percentages are correct.

The length of that 5 percent minor arc (small arc) is 18º = π/10 = 0.314159265358979 theta. Θ • radius = s (0.314159265358979•7e^10 = 21,991,148,575.12855 arc length).

- s = radius when Θ is 18° or π/10 or 0.314159265358979 and is divided into s to get radius
- s/r = arc length per radius
- s arc length = 21,991,148,575.12853
- Θ theta angle = 18°
- s/Θ = r

JESUS is the light of the world as well as the light that took the universe from darkness to light (John 1:5). Jesus could measure light for YHVH (1 John 1:5). Jesus could have used any mathematical or scientific method know or unknown to humanity. All the above examples are explorative and not intended to be anything beyond creative. If the universe does have a shape, there are ways of going about obtaining the shape. One such way might be to look for its curve. Another may be to come to a conclusion about whether its geometry possesses congruency and equidistance. An additional method could be to relate its apothem (if it is an infinite polygon) or diameter (if it is circular) to its shape. The cosmos and everything in it is subject to YHVH. Therefore, God has His own divine laws that can bridge the higher dimension of heaven to outer space to the quantum realm. See formula and examples below the quote that corresponds to the mysteries in the New Babylonian Talmud.

“12 There is no sitting above (in heaven), neither is there eating, drinking, sleep, multiplication, animosity, hatred, provocation, envy, nor stubbornness, weariness nor delay, and that is what David the King of Israel said [ibid. xviii. 12]: “He made darkness his hiding-place” (i.e., it is dark and hidden to all mortals). To what end did David say this? To none other than to praise of the Holy One, blessed be He, who is “Yah,” rules on high, whose unity is one, whose name is one, and who rests in three hundred and ninety heavens, and on each His name and mode of pronunciation are marked; and in each of them there are servants, seraphim, ophanim (wheels, Ezek. I.), cherubim, galgalim, and a throne of glory; and there is no wonder at that, for even as a mortal king has many palaces for the seasons of the year, so much the more the Everlasting, since all is His. And when Israel are doing His will, He rests in the seventh heaven, named Araboth, and does not keep distant from His world, as it is written [Numb. vii. 89]: “From between the two cherubim: and thus he spake unto him.” When offended He ascends to the highest heaven, and all cries and weeping are not listened to, and fasts are ordered, and they roll themselves in ashes, cover themselves with sacks, and shed tears (and all in vain, until He has mercy upon them).”

9(Rab 2:12 ROD)

- DP=DEΛ/T where DP stands for dark power; DE stands for dark energy; Lamda or Λ stands for cosmological constant displacement; T stands for arc time
- (circumference/2)/radius = pi arc 3.141592653589794 ~ 3.141592653589793)
- (alpha-omega arc degree/360) • sphere surface area
- Small arc formula is s (arc) = Θ (theta = radian/π)
**·**r (radius) - Degrees to radian conversion is Degrees/1
**·**π/180**°** - Example one is (390°/180°)π = 13π/6 radians = 2.166666666666667 = Θ
- Example one with theta value is s = (13π/6 theta)•(7e10 radius) = 151,666,666,666.6667π = 476,474,885,794.452 arc length
- Example two is (7°/180°)π = 0.122173047639603 radians = Θ
- Example two with theta value is s = (7π/180 theta)•(7e10 radius) = 8,552,113,334.77221π = 26,867,256,425.18768
- Torus smaller Planck radius circumference -1.005309649149E36 • bigger universe circumference 439,822,971,502.5711 = Torus volume -4.421582771689E47

This challenges evolution. I say this because it seems easier to believe in a creator than to believe in evolution. For instance, how can evolutionists explain a universe that is very slowly starting to wake up and become aware of itself, that is, if humans are really just a collection of atoms looking into outer space (the universe observing itself). This is what the Philosopher Democritus believed. He stated it this way. “Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion.”**10** To make matters even more complicated, the collections of atoms evolutionists call humans sent Voyager One to look for signs of intelligent life (the universe eventually awake, aware, and searching for itself as if it has lost itself).

##### Accessed Websites

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/2_corinthians/12-2.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/colossians/1-16.htm

http://biblehub.com/proverbs/25-3.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/romans/11-36.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/isaiah/37-16.htm

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/job/26-7.htm (THE WEIGHTLESSNESS OF SPACE)

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/isaiah/40-22.htm (TWO DIMENSIONAL SHAPE OF THREE DIMENSIONAL EARTH)

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/job/26-10.htm (HORIZON)

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/john/8-14.htm (MUCH OF THE SCIENCE OF COSMOLOGY UNKNOWN)

https://www.britannica.com/science/latitude

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/isaiah/22-18.htm (THE EARTH IS NOT A TOY AND IS WHY IT IS NOT USED TO DESCRIBE SHAPE OF THE EARTH)

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/amos/5-8.htm (ROTATION ALLOWING NIGHT AND DAY)

https://www.studylight.org/lexicons/hebrew/2015.html

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/ephesians/4-10.htm (COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT)

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/genesis/28-12.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/genesis/28-13.htm

http://www.studylight.org/lexicons/greek/gwview.cgi?n=455

http://biblehub.com/job/38-31.htm

http://biblehub.com/job/9-9.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/acts/17-28.htm

http://m.studylight.org/lexicons/greek/gwview.cgi?n=2795

http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_accel.html

http://biblehub.com/genesis/1-4.htm

https://www.britannica.com/topic/binary-star

https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-Herschel

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/psalms/19-6.htm

http://m.studylight.org/lexicons/hebrew/hwview.cgi?n=8622

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/isaiah/34-4.htm

http://m.studylight.org/lexicons/hebrew/hwview.cgi?n=5612

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/isometry

http://www.britannica.com/science/accretion

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/ezekiel/1-16.htm

http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/blue_shift.aspx

https://www.britannica.com/science/gravitational-wave

https://www.britannica.com/topic/linear-transformation

http://www.britannica.com/science/Doppler-effect

http://www.britannica.com/technology/quartz-crystal-clock

http://www.britannica.com/science/light-year

https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/ellipse.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/einsteins-theory-is-proved-and-it-is-bad-news-if-you-own-a-penthouse-2088195.html

http://www.britannica.com/science/time-dilation

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hubbles-law

http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/laser/en/ https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/light-day

http://biblehub.com/genesis/1-4.htm

https://www.studylight.org/lexicons/hebrew/996.html

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/hebrews/11-3.htm

https://www.studylight.org/lexicons/greek/2675.html

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/job/38-4.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/john/1-5.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/psalms/29-7.htm

http://biblehub.com/interlinear/psalms/18-10.htm

http://biblehub.com/ezekiel/10-16.htm

##### Works Cited

1.Dr Nagaraja, Mamta Patel. “Dark Energy, Dark Matter,” Universe, (Last Updated March 15,2019), Accessed March 15, 2019, https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy

2.Newman, Phil. “The Milky Way Galaxy,” Imagine The Universe, December 2015, (Last Updated Oct 4, 2017), Accessed March 15,2019, https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/objects/milkyway1.html 3.Dunbar, Brian. “Hubble Space Telescope,” NASA’s Hubble Shows Milky Way Is Destined For Head-On Collision. Hubble Science/NASA, May 31, 2012. Accessed June 24, 2019. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/milky-way-collide.html 4.Dr. Lincoln, Don, How to travel faster than light (Video). Fermilab. Accessed May 21, 2019. https://youtu.be/BhG_QZl8WVY

5.Newman, Phil. “StarChild Question of the Month for December 2000,” How old is the universe?, December 2000, Accessed March 15, 2019, https://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question28.html

6.Crane, Leah “NewScientist,” LIGO has spotted another gravitational wave just after turning back on, Magazine Issue 3226, 20 April 2019, Accessed June, 19 2019 7.Khan, Sal, Volume of a rectangular prism: “fractional cubes” (video). Khan Academy. Accessed March 10, 2019. https://www.khanacademy.org/math/basic-geo/basic-geo-volume-sa/volume-with-fractions/v/volume-of-a-rectangular-prism-with-fractional-cubes.

8.Wolfe, Joe. “Relativity in brief….or in detail.” The Planck scale: relativity meets quantum mechanics meets gravity, Accessed March 25, 2019, https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/module6_credits.htm

9.Rodkinson, Michael L. New Edition of the Babylonian Talmud: Original Text, Edited, Corrected, Formulated and Translated into English (ROD). Rabah 2:12. 20 vols. Boston: The Talmud Society, 1918. BibleWorks, v.8. 10. “Democritus Quotes.” BrainyQuote.com. BrainyMedia Inc, 2019. https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/democritus_384195

##### Videography

O’Dowd, Matt, When Time Breaks Down: “Space Time,” PBS Digital Studios. Jan 13, 2016, Accessed June 19, 2019. https://youtu.be/GguAN1_JouQ Dash, Arddhendu Shekhar, Volume of Sphere: “Derivation of formula for volume of sphere using volume of pyramid.” Accessed March 29, 2019. https://youtu.be/xJuY0QT0Z8M.

##### Bibliography

Parker, Barry. Science 101 First Ed: Physics. Irvington: Harper Collins, 2007

62a Chicago Bibliography Entries

Rodkinson, Michael L. New Edition of the Babylonian Talmud: Original Text, Edited, Corrected, Formulated and Translated into English (ROD). 20 vols. Boston: The Talmud Society, 1918. BibleWorks, v.8.

Ryan, Mark. Geometry For Dummies 2nd Edition. Indiana: Wiley Publishing, 2008

##### Suggested Reading

Comfort, Ray Scientific Facts in the Bible. Alachua: Bridge-Logos, 2001